Greetings earthlings!
For our big début we have something truly special - something that gave could give you a minor concussion. Imagine this:
Your advisor wants you to come up with the protocol for perfecting his/her Potion for Making Grad Students Work Like Donkeys. So (s)he starts off by giving you some of her old Potion for Making Grad Students Work Like Donkeys (but which has only enough potency to make you work like a dog and that is the reason why (s)he needs a new protocol) and you dutifully start looking for the protocol. You are convinced that the protocol is in the paper by Kortylewski, M. et al. [1], specifically in the EMSA section.
Since you'd rather read a paper as a PDF, you download the PDF version of the paper first. You slowly make your way through all the text and get to the methods section, only to find that the materials and methods are only available in the Supplementary Information!
Ah, well, you know what they -- "No pain, no gain". So brushing aside this little slap on the cheek, you continue to fish out the methods in the Supplementary Information. You get there only to be greeted with this "EMSA and western blot analysis to detect Stat3 DNA-binding and protein expression were performed as described previously."
(Slaps Forehead). OK, let's get on with this. You then go to the paper this protocol can (hopefully) be found in. And if you thought it was as easy as this, I suggest you read your Grad Student Handbook ASAP. (Remember, Rule 1 : The student shall work like a donkey to get his advisor's work done.)
Sure enough, you do not get the protocol in the second paper[2] either. The second paper reminds you of a dentist who says, "I am just going to drill into your teeth a little. This will only cause a minor discomfort". The paper says "EMSA and western blot analyses to detect Stat-3 DNA-binding property and protein abundance, respectively, were done as previously described."
Oh no, the pain doesn't end here. You have to traverse through two more papers[3, 4], before you actually get the protocol[5]. Of course, by this time, you have lost a sufficient quantity of keratin-based substance on your head (no wonder so many Grad students have an especially bad case of alopecia).
At the end of your quest, you have a minor concussion (I don't go back on my promises) and a happy advisor. Wouldn't life just be easier if you had the steps neatly listed one after the other and all you had to do was carry them out. HAHA! Keep dreaming!
So now down to the scoring of the papers. QMs are supposed to indicate those steps of the protocol that are hard to code up. What happens when the protocol itself is not present where it is supposed to be? I'll leave it for you to decide.
Until next time,
VisualAcuity.
[1] Kortylewski, M. et al. (2009). In vivo delivery of siRNA to immune cells by conjugation to a TLR9 agonist enhances antitumor immune responses. Nature Biotechnology.
[2] Wang, T. et al. (2003). Regulation of the innate and adaptive immune responses by stat-3 signaling in tumor cells. Nature Medicine.
[3] Niu, G. et al. (2002). Constitutive stat3 activity up-regulates vegf expression and tumor angiogenesis. Oncogene.
[4] Turkson, J., Bowman, T., Garcia, R., Caldenhoven, E., Groot, R. P. D., and Jove, R. (1998). Stat3 activation by src induces specific gene regulation and is required for cell transformation. Mol Cell Biol.
[5] Yu, C.-L.,Meyer, D. J., Campbell, G. S., Larner, A. C., Carter-Su, C., Schwartz, J., and Jove, R. (1995). Enhanced dna-binding activity of a stat3-related protein in cells transformed by the src oncoprotein. Science.